So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

先前的条例，因软弱无益，所以废掉了，

一方面，先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了，

一方面，先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了，

以前的条例由于本身的弱点和无益被废除了，

一方面，从前的条例因为软弱，没有用处，就废弃了；

原来，一方面，先前的条例因着本身的软弱和无用，就被废弃了，

先前的條例，因軟弱無益，所以廢掉了，

一方面，先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了，

一方面，先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了，

以前的條例由於本身的弱點和無益被廢除了，

一方面，從前的條例因為軟弱，沒有用處，就廢棄了；

這一來，一方面因規條之劣弱和無益，先前的條例就被廢掉（

原來，一方面，先前的條例因著本身的軟弱和無用，就被廢棄了，

夫前誡因荏弱無益而廢、

夫舊法無益、罔有功效、則遂廢弛、

前之法度、輕弱無益、故廢之、

是則舊制由於荏弱無能、而遭廢棄、

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless

The old rule is set aside. It was weak and useless.

For on the one hand, a former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness

Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless.

For, on the one hand, there is the nullification of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness,

For there is a disannulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness

So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

On the one hand a former command is set aside because it is weak and useless,

For there is an annulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

For what the law could not do since it was weakened by the flesh, God did. He condemned sin in the flesh by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh as a sin offering,

Everyone who believes is justified through him from everything that you could not be justified from through the law of Moses.

But now, since you know God, or rather have become known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elements? Do you want to be enslaved to them all over again?

Now if perfection came through the Levitical priesthood( for on the basis of it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to appear, said to be according to the order of Melchizedek and not according to the order of Aaron?For when there is a change of the priesthood, there must be a change of law as well.

( for the law perfected nothing), but a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God.

For the training of the body has limited benefit, but godliness is beneficial in every way, since it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come.

For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion for a second one.But finding fault with his people, he says: See, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—not like the covenant that I made with their ancestors on the day I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt. I showed no concern for them, says the Lord, because they did not continue in my covenant.For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people.And each person will not teach his fellow citizen, and each his brother or sister, saying,“ Know the Lord,” because they will all know me, from the least to the greatest of them.For I will forgive their wrongdoing, and I will never again remember their sins.By saying a new covenant, he has declared that the first is obsolete. And what is obsolete and growing old is about to pass away.

My point is this: The law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously established by God and thus cancel the promise.

Since the law has only a shadow of the good things to come, and not the reality itself of those things, it can never perfect the worshipers by the same sacrifices they continually offer year after year.Otherwise, wouldn’t they have stopped being offered, since the worshipers, purified once and for all, would no longer have any consciousness of sins?But in the sacrifices there is a reminder of sins year after year.For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.Therefore, as he was coming into the world, he said: You did not desire sacrifice and offering, but you prepared a body for me.You did not delight in whole burnt offerings and sin offerings.Then I said,“ See— it is written about me in the scroll— I have come to do your will, God.”After he says above, You did not desire or delight in sacrifices and offerings, whole burnt offerings and sin offerings( which are offered according to the law),he then says, See, I have come to do your will. He takes away the first to establish the second.

Do we then nullify the law through faith? Absolutely not! On the contrary, we uphold the law.

Don’t be led astray by various kinds of strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be established by grace and not by food regulations, since those who observe them have not benefited.

Brothers and sisters, I’m using a human illustration. No one sets aside or makes additions to a validated human will.

Tell me, you who want to be under the law, don’t you hear the law?

This is a symbol for the present time, during which gifts and sacrifices are offered that cannot perfect the worshiper’s conscience.They are physical regulations and only deal with food, drink, and various washings imposed until the time of the new order.